[Pythonmac-SIG] Problems with pimp in 2.3.4

[Ronald Oussoren]

On 7-jul-04, at 13:15, Michael Hudson wrote:

> Bob Ippolito <bob at redivi.com> writes:
>
>> On Jul 6, 2004, at 4:55 PM, Jack Jansen wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 6 Jul 2004, at 00:05, Markus Neff wrote:
>>>> I just tried the GUI Package manager and pimp.py and both seem as
>>>> they would work now. Before I go on, please allow one further
>>>> question: is it possible to install the listed binary packages into
>>>> any Python 2.3.x version (binary compatibility)?
>>>
>>> That is definitely the intention of Python micro-releases, so if
>>> this isn't the case please let me know.
>>
>> But it isn't necessarily the case.  Each .so will have a mach-o load
>> command pointing to some particular Python path, except when using the
>> -undefined dynamic_lookup linker flag on 10.3.  Has that linking style
>> been backported to any 2.3.x release?
>
> But the paths should be the same for any 2.3.x release -- there's a
> lot of the moral equivalent of sys.version[:3] going on in computing
> paths in Python...
>
> Or have I missed something?

Extensions are not interchangeable between pythons with a different 
--prefix.

Ronald
--
X|support bv            http://www.xsupport.nl/
T:  +31 610271479       F:  +31 204416173