Configuring an object via a dictionary

[Loris Bennett]

Tobiah <toby at tobiah.org> writes:

> I should mention that I wanted to answer your question,
> but I wouldn't actually do this.  I'd rather opt for
> your self.config = config solution.  The config options
> should have their own namespace.
>
> I don't mind at all referencing foo.config['option'],
> or you could make foo.config an object by itself so
> you can do foo.config.option.  You'd fill it's attributes
> in the same way I suggested for your main object.

Thanks for the thoughts.  I'll go for self.config = config after
all, since, as you say, the clutter caused by the referencing is not
that significant.

Cheers,

Loris

-- 
This signature is currently under constuction.