How/where to store calibration values - written by program A, read by program B

MRAB python at mrabarnett.plus.com
Wed Dec 6 13:12:20 EST 2023


On 2023-12-06 12:23, Thomas Passin via Python-list wrote:
> On 12/6/2023 6:35 AM, Barry Scott via Python-list wrote:
>> 
>> 
>>> On 6 Dec 2023, at 09:32, Chris Green via Python-list <python-list at python.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> My requirement is *slightly* more complex than just key value pairs,
>>> it has one level of hierarchy, e.g.:-
>>>
>>>     KEY1:
>>>       a: v1
>>>       c: v3
>>>       d: v4
>>>     KEY2:
>>>       a: v7
>>>       b: v5
>>>       d: v6
>>>
>>> Different numbers of value pairs under each KEY.
>> 
>> JSON will allow you to nest dictionaries.
>> 
>> {
>>      'KEY1': {
>>          'a': v1
>>          'c': v3
>>          'd': v4
>>      }
>>      'KEY2': {
>>           'a': v7
>>           'b': v5
>>           'd': v6
>>      }
>> }
>> 
>> Personally I would not use .ini style these days as the format does not include type of the data.
> 
> Neither does JSON.  Besides, JSON is more complicated than necessary
> here - in fact, your example isn't even legal JSON since lines are
> missing commas.
> 
> Fun fact - for at least some, maybe most, JSON files, using eval() on
> them is hugely faster than using Python's standard JSON library.  I
> learned this when I wanted to ingest a large browser bookmarks JSON
> file. It wouldn't matter for a much smaller file, of course.
> 
It would be safer if you used literal_eval.


More information about the Python-list mailing list