for -- else: what was the motivation?

[Chris Angelico]

On Mon, 17 Oct 2022 at 16:36, Antoon Pardon <antoon.pardon at vub.be> wrote:
>
>
>
> Op 17/10/2022 om 04:01 schreef Chris Angelico:
> > On Mon, 17 Oct 2022 at 10:46,<avi.e.gross at gmail.com>  wrote:
> >> My point Chris was that you can have a conversation where you are exploring
> >> and not proposing. Brainstorming, perhaps.
> > And my point is that either a proposal is a serious one that can
> > expect serious discussion, or it isn't. Yes, I'm aware that it wasn't
> > you who backpedalled as soon as any criticism was posted, but your
> > caveat comes to the same thing - if you're trying to avoid serious
> > criticism, you have to not post an idea.
>
> Your reaction was not serious criticisme but a belligerent reaction.
> You made it clear you wanted a fight. I choose not to enter that
> fight.
>

Well, if reacting strongly to a proposal to break LITERALLY EVERY
PYTHON PROGRAM EVER counts as not a serious criticism but a
belligerent reaction, then there's not really a lot of point
discussing further.

Bye.

ChrisA