for -- else: what was the motivation?

[Karsten Hilbert]

Am Sun, Oct 09, 2022 at 05:37:59AM +0100 schrieb Axy via Python-list:

> Python is awesome because it's semantic is clear for the majority, but there are places
> that look odd. In case of "for", "else" looks logically tied with "for" clause, but
> actually it is not. It's tied with "break" statement and I overlooked that even after
> re-reading the language reference. If "else" was named like "never_broken_loop" or
> "nobreak", the semantic would be perfectly clear. But, what's done is done.

Or, "eventually". Sadly, "finally" is already taken, and with
slightly different semantics...

Karsten
--
GPG  40BE 5B0E C98E 1713 AFA6  5BC0 3BEA AC80 7D4F C89B