an oop question

[Greg Ewing]

On 5/11/22 4:25 am, Chris Angelico wrote:
> Maybe it's one of those terms that is useless for actual coding
> (because practicality beats purity), but good for discussions?

I'm not sure it's much good for discussions, either. I don't
really care whether a language is "purely OO" or not, whatever
that means, because I don't see purity of OO as a virtue.
All I care about is what actual features then language has.

-- 
Greg