seeking deeper (language theory) reason behind Python design choice

Chris Angelico rosuav at gmail.com
Wed May 16 10:32:59 EDT 2018


On Thu, May 17, 2018 at 12:25 AM, Grant Edwards
<grant.b.edwards at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2018-05-16, Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python at pearwood.info> wrote:
>> On Tue, 15 May 2018 22:21:15 +0200, Peter J. Holzer wrote:
>>
>>> On 2018-05-15 00:52:42 +0000, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
>> [...]
>>>> By 1991 there had already been *decades* of experience with C
>>>
>>> About one and a half decades.
>>
>> That would still be plural decades.
>
> So would zero. ;)
>
> The only plural in English implies is that the quantity is not 1.  It
> does _not_ imply the quantity is greater than 1.

By 1991 there had already been AT LEAST negative seven decades of
experience with C. It's mathematically provable! And completely
useless.

ChrisA



More information about the Python-list mailing list