seeking deeper (language theory) reason behind Python design choice

[Mikhail V]

On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 8:50 AM, Chris Angelico <rosuav at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 3:36 PM, Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> while True:
>>     if we_are_done():
>>         break
>>     # do some stuff
>>     ...
>>     if error_occurred():
>>         break
>> notify_user()
>>
>>
>> Fixed, using idiomatic Python and without needing to use assignment in
>> an expression.
>
> Why is it that "while True" is idiomatic Python for a non-infinite
> loop? Is it merely because Python currently has no other way to spell
> certain loops? Surely it would be more idiomatic to encode the loop's
> termination condition in the header, if it were possible.

Don't know about 'idiomatic', but the above spelling is exactly what i
tend to use lately for almost all loops. It noticeably reduces cognitive load.
Though lately more often i prefer "while 1:" so it makes
the nodes more lightweight and distinct from the rest lines.
And not even official declaration of "idiomatic" as something else will
make me switch back.