newb question about @property

[Ned Batchelder]

On 9/30/17 5:47 PM, Bill wrote:
> I spent a few hours experimenting with @property. To my mind it seems 
> like it would be preferable to just define (override) instance methods 
> __get__(), __set__(), and possibly __del__(), as desired, as I could 
> easily provide them with "ideal" customization. Am I overlooking 
> something?
>

It would be easier to comment if you showed the two options. One with 
@property, and one with __get__ etc.

A downside to __get__ is that you need to create a class with those 
methods, and then instantiate that class as an attribute in your real 
class, whereas @property can be used without a lot of rigamarole.

--Ned.