Benefits of unicode identifiers (was: Allow additional separator in identifiers)

[Thomas Jollans]

On 23/11/17 23:15, Richard Damon wrote:
> 
> My thought is you define a legal only those Unicode characters that via
> the defined classification would be normally legal, but perhaps the
> first implementation doesn't diagnose many of the illegal combinations.
> If that isn't Pythonic, then yes, implementing a fuller classification
> would be needed. That might also say normalization questions would need
> to be decided too.
> 

You do realise that Python has a perfectly good definition of what's
allowed in an identifier that is thoroughly grounded in the Unicode
standard and works very well, right?


-- Thomas