Ideas about how software should behave

[Marko Rauhamaa]

Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz>:
> There are plenty of good ways of criticising an idea that are clearly
> about the idea itself, so there is no need to resort to adjectives
> that could be misunderstood as veiled ad-hominem attacks.

I disagree. Ad hominems are needed when you run out of reasoned
arguments but feel the need to defend the honor of your dear programming
language.


Marko