Python 3 removes name binding from outer scope

[Ben Finney]

Ben Finney <ben+python at benfinney.id.au> writes:

> Having to make another name for the same object, merely to avoid some
> surprising behaviour, is IMO un-Pythonic.

I suppose my objection is rooted in the fact this behaviour is implicit;
my code has not issued a ‘del’ statement, and so I don't expect one; yet
it occurs implicitly. This violates the Zen of Python.

> PEP 3000 documents the change::

I got the wrong number there; it's PEP 3110.

-- 
 \     “Please do not feed the animals. If you have any suitable food, |
  `\                     give it to the guard on duty.” —zoo, Budapest |
_o__)                                                                  |
Ben Finney