Can math.atan2 return INF?

[Lawrence D’Oliveiro]

On Thursday, June 30, 2016 at 6:57:41 PM UTC+12, Paul Rubin wrote:

>> Every time somebody tries to point to an example of a “topic that is
>> beyond the reach of science”, it seems to get knocked over eventually.
> 
> Generate a sequence of "random" bits from your favorite physical source
> (radioactive decay, quantum entanglement, or whatever).  Is the sequence
> really algorithmically random (like in Kolmogorov randomness)?  This is
> scientifically unknowable.

The definition of “random” is “unknowable”. So all you are stating is a tautology.