Operator Precedence/Boolean Logic

[Rustom Mody]

Heh! A flurry of opinions!
No time right now… other than to say thank you (MRAB) for this little gem:

On Saturday, July 16, 2016 at 10:29:02 PM UTC+5:30, MRAB wrote:
> On 2016-07-16 17:27, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> > On Sat, 16 Jul 2016 10:33 pm, Rustom Mody wrote:
> [snip]
> 
> > And yes, Rustom, I'm very familiar with the philosophical objections to the
> > something/nothing distinction. "Is zero truly nothing, or is it some thing
> > distinct from the absence of any number?" I'm not interested in that
> > argument. Let the philosophers count angels, but as far as Python code
> > goes, I'm an intuitionist: if I have zero sheep, that's the same as not
> > having any sheep, or having no sheep.
> >
> [snip]
> 
> And if you're going to argue that zero is something, then you could also 
> argue that false is something...

Likewise Chris’ example of the comparison of Pike and Python alternative
semantics