Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions

[Lawrence D’Oliveiro]

On Sunday, July 3, 2016 at 11:53:46 PM UTC+12, Ian wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 2, 2016 at 11:37 PM, Lawrence D’Oliveiro wrote:
>> That is a function that I am generating, so naturally I want to give it a
>> useful docstring. Am I “clobbering” any objects passed in by the caller,
>> or returned by the caller? No, I am not.
> 
> It isn't useful, though. If somebody writes a docstring for a
> function, it's because they want that to be the docstring for the
> function ...

Which I am not “clobbering” at all. Do you get that yet? My docstrings apply to *my* functions, not those supplied or generated by the caller.