Meta decorator with parameters, defined in explicit functions

[Lawrence D’Oliveiro]

On Saturday, July 2, 2016 at 5:10:06 PM UTC+12, Ian wrote:
> You should use functools.wraps instead of clobbering the decorated
> function's name and docstring:

Where am I doing that?
> Just to satisfy my own curiosity, do you have something against
> putting the return keyword and the returned expression on the same
> line?

Yes.