Instead of deciding between Python or Lisp for a programming intro course...What about an intro course that uses *BOTH*? Good idea?
Grant Edwards
invalid at invalid.invalid
Mon May 11 10:35:45 EDT 2015
On 2015-05-11, Skip Montanaro <skip.montanaro at gmail.com> wrote:
> Don't CS departments still have a computer languages survey class? When I
> was a graduate student at Iowa in the early 80s, we had one. (It was, as I
> recall, an upper level undergrad course. I didn't get into CS until
> graduate school, so went back to filled in some missing stuff.) I don't
> recall all the languages we touched on, but ISTR there were five or six. I
> know we hit Lisp (today, it would likely be Scheme), and probably APL
> (today it would probably be Python+Pandas, MATLAB, R, or something similar).
There was a similar class at both Iowa State and University of MN. You
learned a half-dozen languages in a single quarter. IIRC, at ISU we
did Lisp, Prolog, APL, Snobol and a couple others. The main
pedagogical language at the time was Pascal, but we also learned
FORTRAN, COBOL, BASIC, and a couple three assembly languages (PDP-11,
VAX, Z80, 6502). If you were a computer enineering major instead of
computer science, you also leared a hardware description language. At
the time it was AHPL.
More recent gruaduates only seem to know one language (Java or C++)
and are completely baffled by anything else.
And don't get me started on that damned noise they call music...
--
Grant Edwards grant.b.edwards Yow! ! Now I understand
at advanced MICROBIOLOGY and
gmail.com th' new TAX REFORM laws!!
More information about the Python-list
mailing list