A simple single line, triple-quoted comment is giving syntax error. Why?

[Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn]

Ian Kelly wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn
>>> No, in the used flavour of EBNF the unquoted “+” following a goal symbol
>>> clearly means the occurrence of *at least one* of the immediately
>>> preceding symbol, meaning either one *or more than one*.
>>
>> It means one or more *tokens*, not one or more literals.
> 
> Although reading the documentation, it seems that it also conflates
> string literals with tokens,

There is nothing to conflate here.  String literals *are* tokens.

> so on that I'll have to concede the point.

Too late, the rebuttal is already underway :-p

-- 
PointedEars

Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.