Pure Python Data Mangling or Encrypting

[Mark Lawrence]

On 26/06/2015 01:33, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 1:26 AM, Jon Ribbens
> <jon+usenet at unequivocal.co.uk> wrote:
>>> There are only 256 possible values for n, one of which doesn't transform the
>>> data at all (ROT-0). If you're thinking of attacking this by pencil and
>>> paper, 255 transformations sounds like a lot. For a computer, that's barely
>>> harder than a single transformation.
>>
>> Well, it means you need to send 256 times as much data, which is a
>> start. If you're instead using a 256-byte translation table then
>> an attack becomes utterly impractical.
>>
>
> Utterly impractical? Maybe, if you attempt a pure brute-force approach
> - there are 256! possible translation tables, which is roughly e500
> attempts [1], and at roughly four a microsecond [2] that'd still take
> a ridiculously long time. But there are two gigantic optimizations you
> could do. Firstly, there are frequency-based attacks, and byte value
> duplicates will tell you a lot - classic cryptographic work. And
> secondly, you can simply take the first few bytes of a file - let's
> say 16, although a lot of files can be recognized in less than that.
> Even if there are no duplicate bytes, that'd be a maximum of 16!
> translation tables that truly matter, or just 2e13. At the same speed,
> that makes about a million seconds of computing time required. Divide
> that across a bunch of separate computers (the job is embarrassingly
> parallel after all), and you could get that result pretty easily. Cut
> the prefix to just 8 bytes and you have a mere 40K encryption keys to
> try - so quick that you wouldn't even see it happen. Nope, a simple
> substitution cipher is still not secure. Even the famous Enigma
> machine was a lot more than just letter-for-letter substitution - a
> double letter in the cleartext wouldn't be represented by a double
> letter in the result - and once the machine's secrets were figured
> out, the day's key could be reassembled fairly readily.
>

The day's key for a given network, with the Luftwaffe easily being the 
worst offenders.  Some networks remained unbroken at the end of WWII.

-- 
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask
what you can do for our language.

Mark Lawrence