Python is DOOMED! Again!

[Steven D'Aprano]

Chris Angelico wrote:

> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 5:36 PM, Steven D'Aprano
> <steve+comp.lang.python at pearwood.info> wrote:
>> I consider return type to be part of the function signature. The
>> signature of a function is the parameters it accepts and the result it
>> returns.
> 
> It is, but there are times when it isn't significant. For instance,
> C++ overloaded functions are distinguished by their function
> signatures, but *not* including the return values (nor several other
> aspects).

C++ is an unholy abomination unto Nuggan :-)


-- 
Steve