Catogorising strings into random versus non-random

Rick Johnson rantingrickjohnson at gmail.com
Mon Dec 21 20:45:49 EST 2015

Previous message (by thread): Catogorising strings into random versus non-random
Next message (by thread): [RELEASED] Python 3.4.4 is now available
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Sunday, December 20, 2015 at 10:22:57 PM UTC-6, Chris Angelico wrote:
> DuckDuckGo doesn't give a result count, so I skipped it. Yahoo search yielded:

So why bother to mention it then? Is this another one of your "pikeish" propaganda campaigns?

Previous message (by thread): Catogorising strings into random versus non-random
Next message (by thread): [RELEASED] Python 3.4.4 is now available
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

More information about the Python-list mailing list