pyflakes best practices?
Roy Smith
roy at panix.com
Thu May 29 21:14:20 EDT 2014
In article <mailman.10467.1401411041.18130.python-list at python.org>,
Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy at yahoo.co.uk> wrote:
> On 30/05/2014 01:13, Roy Smith wrote:
> > We've recently started using pyflakes. The results seem to be similar
> > to most tools of this genre. It found a few real problems. It
> > generated a lot of noise about things which weren't really wrong, but
> > were easy to fix (mostly, unused imports), and a few plain old false
> > positives which have no easy "fix" (in the sense of, things I can change
> > which will make pyflakes STFU).
> >
> > So, what's the best practice here? How do people deal with the false
> > positives? Is there some way to annotate the source code to tell
> > pyflakes to ignore something?
> >
>
> I was under the impression that pyflakes was configurable. It it isn't
> I'd simply find another tool. Having said that if you don't get better
> answers here try gmane.comp.python.code-quality.
I didn't know that list existed, it looks very interesting. Thanks for
the pointer!
More information about the Python-list
mailing list