Make Python Compilable, convert to Python source to Go

Mark Lawrence breamoreboy at yahoo.co.uk
Sun May 25 07:40:15 EDT 2014


On 25/05/2014 12:02, mm0fmf wrote:
> On 25/05/2014 11:24, Mark Lawrence wrote:
>> On 25/05/2014 09:17, bookaa bookaa wrote:
>>> Maybe I will work on Python 3 later.
>>>
>>
>> That's good to know, it'll save me wasting my time looking at it now.
>>
> OT:
> Mark, you've been pro-Python3 enough in your recent postings you have
> forced me to act. I've just upgraded my 1st Python2 app to Python3. 2to3
> did 99.999% of the work and I had to get a more modern version of a
> package which was Python3 compatible.
>
>  From Tuesday (Monday is a holiday), all new Python code at work will be
> Python3
>
> Andy

I merely think Python 3 is the way to go, and that the Python 2.8 crew 
don't so much have loose screws, but never had them fitted in the first 
place.

FTR I entirely agree with Roy Smith about sticking with Python 2 in his 
situation, strikes me as a complete no brainer.

-- 
My fellow Pythonistas, ask not what our language can do for you, ask 
what you can do for our language.

Mark Lawrence

---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com





More information about the Python-list mailing list