Unicode in Python
wxjmfauth at gmail.com
wxjmfauth at gmail.com
Sat May 3 03:46:28 EDT 2014
Le vendredi 2 mai 2014 05:50:40 UTC+2, Michael Torrie a écrit :
> Can't help but feed the troll... forgive me.
>
>
>
> On 04/28/2014 02:57 AM, wxjmfauth at gmail.com wrote:
>
> > Python 2.7 + cp1252:
>
> > - Solid and coherent system (nothing to do with the Euro).
>
>
>
> Except that cp1252 is not unicode. Perhaps some subset of unicode can
>
> be encoded into bytes using cp1252. But if it works for you keep using
>
> it, and stop spreading nonsense about FSR.
>
>
>
> > Python 3:
>
> > - Flexible String Representation (a problem per se),
>
> > a mathematical absurditiy which does the opposite of
>
> > the coding schemes endorsed by Unicord.org (sheet of
>
> > paper and pencil!)
>
> > - Very deeply buggy (quadrature of the circle problem).
>
>
>
> Maybe it's the language barrier, but whatever it is you are talking
>
> about, I certainly can't make out.
>
>
>
> You've been ranting about FSR for years without being able to clearly
>
> say what's wrong with it. Please quote unicode specifications that you
>
> feel Python does not implement. What unicode characters cannot be
>
> represented? Does Python choke on certain unicode strings or expose
>
> entities it should not (like Javascript does)?
>
>
>
> Why would you think that the unicode consortium's list of byte encodings
>
> are the only possible valid ways of encoding unicode to a byte stream?
>
>
>
> If you're going to continue to write this sort of stuff, please have the
>
> decency to answer these questions at least.
>
>
>
> > Positive side:
>
> > - A very nice tool to teach the coding of characters
>
> > and unicode.
>
>
>
> Indeed.
========
-
More information about the Python-list
mailing list