Question about Source Control
Roy Smith
roy at panix.com
Fri Mar 21 08:23:31 EDT 2014
In article <mailman.8348.1395381664.18130.python-list at python.org>,
Cameron Simpson <cs at zip.com.au> wrote:
> hg blame bin/set-x
>
> and the output goes:
>
> [hg/css]fleet*> hg blame bin/set-x
> 2186: #!/bin/sh
> 11359: #
> 11359: # Trace execution of a command.
There's two things hg blame doesn't do which would be useful.
First, the trivial one. I don't want lines annotated by change number,
I want them annotated by the name of the person who checked it in. But,
I'm sure that can be easily fixed with some simple post-processing
filter, so it really falls into the bucket of "minor annoyances".
The hard thing is I don't really want to know which change most recently
touched the line of text. I want to know who really wrote it. It would
be wonderful if hg were smart enough to be able to back-track through
the change history and ignore trivial changes like whitespace,
refactoring a function out of one file into another, etc. That's the
real meat and potatoes of "blame". I want to know who I need to hit
over the head with a clue-by-four once I fix a bug.
More information about the Python-list
mailing list