Proposal: === and !=== operators

[Rustom Mody]

On Wednesday, July 9, 2014 2:47:40 PM UTC+5:30, Steven D'Aprano wrote:
> On Wed, 09 Jul 2014 17:21:20 +1000, Chris Angelico wrote:

> > wrote:
> >> Thoughts? Comments?
> > First thought: It will just add confusion. Currently, there are small
> > pockets of confusion surrounding the few cases where something's
> > non-reflexive, and there are occasional threads on the subject, like we
> > have now. 

> It's a reoccurring issue that keeps coming up over and over again. Most 
> people have no need of NANs, and want them to behave like "normal" 
> objects. I'm sympathetic to this idea.

-nan from me

 And since you count nans as normal, I am sure you can work out
 how much that amounts to <wink>