The potential for a Python 2.8.

[Roy Smith]

In article <lbu1an$3rb$1 at reader1.panix.com>,
 Grant Edwards <invalid at invalid.invalid> wrote:

> On 2014-01-24, Roy Smith <roy at panix.com> wrote:
> > In article <mailman.5927.1390530488.18130.python-list at python.org>,
> >  Chris Angelico <rosuav at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Roy Smith <roy at panix.com> wrote:
> >> >> Python 2.8j?
> >> >
> >> > You're imagining things.
> >> 
> >> Get real... s'not gonna happen.
> >> 
> > I wouldn't bet on that.  The situation keeps getting tensor and
> > tensor.
> 
> I have a feeling there's a pun there based on the worlds "real" and
> "tensor", but I don't have the math skills required to figure it out.

You must be pretty weak in math, then.  This really isn't that complex.

[some of you who hang out on panix know where this is heading...]