The potential for a Python 2.8.

[Chris Angelico]

On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 1:34 PM, Roy Smith <roy at panix.com> wrote:
> In article <mailman.5927.1390530488.18130.python-list at python.org>,
>  Chris Angelico <rosuav at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Roy Smith <roy at panix.com> wrote:
>> >> Python 2.8j?
>> >
>> > You're imagining things.
>>
>> Get real... s'not gonna happen.
>>
> I wouldn't bet on that.  The situation keeps getting tensor and tensor.

I can't complain, really. This was a perfectly rational discussion
until I suggested "e.1".

ChrisA