With this artifact, everyone can easily invent new languages

Simeon Chaos simeon.chaos at gmail.com
Sat Jan 11 04:12:24 EST 2014


Thank you, James. I didn't know this group before. I'll post this message there.

在 2014年1月11日星期六UTC+8下午3时47分33秒,James Harris写道:
> "Simeon Chaos" <simeon.chaos @ gmail.com> wrote in message 
> 
> news:bb7d8d30-845a-4a3d-9b03-dee71ef42986 @googlegroups.com...
> 
> > ? 2014?1?11????UTC+8??10?17?33?,Chris Angelico??:
> 
> > > On Sat, Jan 11, 2014 at 11:59 AM, Simeon Chaos wrote:
> 
> > >
> 
> > > > All along, the design of programming languages is a complex task. 
> 
> > > > Because we need to understand the esoteric compiler theory and 
> 
> > > > technology, and one of the most critical and very difficult part is to 
> 
> > > > define the rules of the new language and to parse with them.To solve 
> 
> > > > this problem, there have been many theories , techniques and tools . 
> 
> > > > These tools can be roughly divided into two categories: one is parser 
> 
> > > > generator, another is to write the parser by hand with or without a 
> 
> > > > parser library.
> 
> 
> 
> > Yes, it's complex to design a new language. So don't let the tool stand in 
> 
> > the way. There is a saying: Grinding a chopper will not hold up the work 
> 
> > of cutting firewood.
> 
> 
> 
> To the OP: this is a suitable topic for comp.lang.misc which is used for 
> 
> discussions about programming language design and implementation such as 
> 
> parse mechanisms.
> 
> 
> 
> James




More information about the Python-list mailing list