the Gravity of Python 2
Roy Smith
roy at panix.com
Wed Jan 8 09:15:35 EST 2014
As somebody who is still firmly in the 2.x world, I'm worried about the
idea of a 2.x fork. While I have my doubts that 3.x was a good idea,
the fact is, it's here. Having the community fractured between the two
camps is not good. Let's say I'm somebody who wants to contribute some
OSS. I have three basic choices:
1) I can make it 3.x only. Now, (nominally) half of the python
community is unable to realize value from my contribution.
2) I can make it 2.x only. Same thing in reverse.
3) I can make it work on both 2.x and 3.x, which means I'm investing
more effort than I had to if it were single platform.
Any of those alternatives is worse than ideal. Forking 2.x to create an
unofficial 2.8 release would just prolong the situation. As I've stated
before, I don't see any urgency in moving to 3.x, and don't imagine
doing there for another couple of years, but I absolutely can't imagine
moving to a 2.8 fork.
More information about the Python-list
mailing list