Blog "about python 3"

[Terry Reedy]

On 1/7/2014 8:34 AM, wxjmfauth at gmail.com wrote:
> Le dimanche 5 janvier 2014 23:14:07 UTC+1, Terry Reedy a écrit :

>> Memory: Point 2. A *design goal* of FSR was to save memory relative  to
>> UTF-32, which is what you apparently prefer. Your examples show that FSF
>> successfully met its design goal. But you call that success, saving
>> memory, 'wrong'. On what basis?

> Point 2: This Flexible String Representation does no
> "effectuate" any memory optimization. It only succeeds
> to do the opposite of what a corrrect usage of utf*
> do.

Since the FSF *was* successful in saving memory, and indeed shrank the 
Python binary by about a megabyte, I have no idea what you mean.

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy