Postfix conditionals
Rhodri James
rhodri at wildebst.org.uk
Sun Jan 5 20:40:02 EST 2014
On Sun, 05 Jan 2014 20:24:53 -0000, Göktuğ Kayaalp <self at gkayaalp.com>
wrote:
> AFAIK, we do not have "postfix conditionals" in Python, i.e. a condition
> appended to a statement, which determines whether the statement runs or
> not:
> py> for i in [False]:
> ... break if not i
> The above piece of code is equivalent to this in Python:
> py> for i in [False]:
> ... if not i
> ... break
> I believe that the first example is superior to the second example when
> the two is compared for readability and intuitiveness.
In my past life as a newcomer to Perl, I thought this too. Postfix
conditionals read more like English, so they would be easier to take in
and understand. As I wrote more code, I discovered that this didn't seem
to be the case; except in very simple cases, I had to mentally transpose
the conditional back to the start of the statement to properly comprehend
what was going on and what the results would be for my sample data.
It looks like a good idea, but I don't think it works that well in
practice.
--
Rhodri James *-* Wildebeest Herder to the Masses
More information about the Python-list
mailing list