Is Python really "Lisp without parentheses"? So would it be easy to *implement* a lot of Python in Scheme/Lisp?

[Steven D'Aprano]

Chris Seberino wrote:

> The basics of Scheme or Lisp are amazingly easy to implement.  Would
> implementing a subset of Python in a Scheme subset be a clever way to
> easily implement a lot of Python?

I don't know how easy it was, but it was done:

http://common-lisp.net/project/clpython/



-- 
Steven