[OT] Usage of U+00B6 PILCROW SIGN
Robert Kern
robert.kern at gmail.com
Thu Feb 6 14:29:19 EST 2014
On 2014-02-06 17:23, Chris Angelico wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 11:23 PM, Rustom Mody <rustompmody at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Tuesday, February 4, 2014 8:51:25 PM UTC+5:30, jmf wrote:
>>
>>> Useless and really ugly.
>>
>> Evidently one can do worse:
>>
>> http://www.pip-installer.org/en/latest/installing.html#requirements
>
> Aside from using a little "chain link" icon rather than a
> typographer's symbol, that looks exactly the same. How's it worse?
When I looked at it earlier today, I got a default "cannot find this glyph" box
instead of the chain icon. I assumed that is what Rustom was referring to. It's
working for me now.
--
Robert Kern
"I have come to believe that the whole world is an enigma, a harmless enigma
that is made terrible by our own mad attempt to interpret it as though it had
an underlying truth."
-- Umberto Eco
More information about the Python-list
mailing list