[OT] Usage of U+00B6 PILCROW SIGN
wxjmfauth at gmail.com
wxjmfauth at gmail.com
Wed Feb 5 13:58:02 EST 2014
Le mercredi 5 février 2014 16:23:01 UTC+1, Ned Batchelder a écrit :
> On 2/5/14 9:41 AM, wxjmfauth at gmail.com wrote:
>
> > If you put the FSR on the table.
>
> > I think I have a very correct vision of what Unicode
>
> > should be and*is*. (*)
>
> > I belong to those who know that latin-1 is unusable for
>
> > more than ten European languages based on latin scripts.
>
> > Today, one can add German to these.
>
> > No offense, you are still stuck and living in
>
> > the ascii world. (The recent byte string discussion
>
> > was very informative on that subject).
>
> >
>
> > Writing that the FSR does not suit my needs seems to me
>
> > a little bit exagerated. You should have more concerns
>
> > about something like "ReportLab" than about my (jmf) software.
>
> >
>
> > (*) Luckily, that's already the case for the users using
>
> > serious tools.
>
>
>
> We've been over this too many times already, and we won't be discussing
>
> it with you again.
>
>
>
> --
>
> Ned Batchelder, http://nedbatchelder.com
I agree.
(but I was a little bit provocated)
jmf
More information about the Python-list
mailing list