OFF TOPIC Snow Crash [was Re: Hello World]
alister
alister.nospam.ware at ntlworld.com
Wed Dec 24 06:50:27 EST 2014
On Tue, 23 Dec 2014 16:20:10 +0000, Grant Edwards wrote:
> On 2014-12-23, Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python at pearwood.info>
> wrote:
>> Chris Angelico wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 12:15 AM, Roy Smith <roy at panix.com> wrote:
>>>> If I really didn't trust something, I'd go to AWS and spin up one of
>>>> their free-tier micro instances and run it there :-)
>>>
>>> How do you know it won't create console output that stroboscopically
>>> infects you with a virus through your eyes? Because that's *totally*
>>> what would be done in the town of Eureka.
>>
>> Anybody in IT who hasn't read Neal Stephenson's "Snow Crash" needs to
>> hand in their Geek Card immediately.
>
> I tried, but I got so tired of the author doing stuff like pointing out
> that there were 65536 of something or other (and that it's a power of
> TWO, kids!) that I gave up. The annoying thing was that there was no
> real technical reason why the quantity _needed_ to be a power of two.
> Too many of the technical details that you got constantly beat over the
> head with were
>
> 1) not even remotely relevent to the story
>
> 2) mostly an effort by the author to demonstrate that he had a
> junior-high level understanding of a 68K based Macintosh and knew
> lots of cool grown up tech-sounding words -- and even if had only a
> vague idea of what they meant, he could still impress the other
> 13-year olds.
>
> 3) just plain wrong
>
> And even _with_ all the technical jibber-jabber, none of it explained or
> justified the whole "writing a virus to infect the brain through the
> optic nerve" thing which might just have well been magick and witches.
I am reading it now thanks to this list & I currently agree that it is
quite annoying
what feels like 3 or 4 chapters in & it is still trying to set the scene,
an exercise in stylish writing with very little content so far.
even early scifi written for magazines on a per word basis were not this
excessive (because if they were they would probably have been rejected or
seriously edited).
Hopefully it will finally settle down & amend my current impression.
--
Guns don't kill people. It's those damn bullets. Guns just make them go
really really fast.
-- Jake Johanson
More information about the Python-list
mailing list