Why my ; continuator idea is better for debugging too.

[Skybuck Flying]

A:=B:=C:=D:=0;

With the continuator idea this coding would look as follows:

Good single line code:

A:=B:=C:=D:=0

Bad multi line code:

A:=
B:=
C:=
D:=
0

^This would not be allowed and lead to error messages.

Good multi line code:

A:=;
B:=;
C:=;
D:=;
0

^ This would lead to a good compile.

Bye,
  Skybuck :)