Making every no-arg method a property?

Rob Gaddi rgaddi at technologyhighland.invalid
Wed Aug 6 12:53:16 EDT 2014


On Wed, 6 Aug 2014 05:13:07 +0000 (UTC)
Grant Edwards <invalid at invalid.invalid> wrote:

> On 2014-08-05, Gregory Ewing <greg.ewing at canterbury.ac.nz> wrote:
> > Grant Edwards wrote:
> >> Did I miss a news story?  Have the parentesis mines all exploded
> >> causing the price of parenthesis to skyrocket?
> >
> > The Unicode Consortium has been secretly buying them
> > up for some time now. Pretty soon you won't be able
> > to get cheap ASCII parentheses any more, only the
> > fancy high-priced ones like U+2045/U+2046,
> > U+2772/U+2773 and U+27E6/U+27E7.
> 
> Damn.  Time to buy some options...
> 
> -- 
> Grant
> 

No, no.  Options use up commas, not parentheses.  Maybe equals signs if
you're feeling particularly verbose.

Clearly there's a market for some sort of well-diversified punctuation
fund.  The only problem becomes listing it.


-- 
Rob Gaddi, Highland Technology -- www.highlandtechnology.com
Email address domain is currently out of order.  See above to fix.



More information about the Python-list mailing list