Unicode in Python

Chris Angelico rosuav at gmail.com
Wed Apr 23 03:06:43 EDT 2014


On Wed, Apr 23, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Rustom Mody <rustompmody at gmail.com> wrote:
> In such a (default) setup typing a ∧ or ∨ is not possible at all without
> something like a char-picker and at best has an ergonomic cost that is an
> order of magnitude higher than the 'naturally available' characters.
>
> On the other hand when/if a keyboard mapping is defined in which
> the characters that are commonly needed are available, it is
> reasonable to expect the ∨,∧ to cost no more than 2 strokes each
> (ie about as much as an 'A'; slightly more than an 'a'. Which means
> that '∨' is expected to cost about the same as 'or' and ∧ to cost less than an 'and'

So how much effort are you going to go to for, effectively, the same
end result? You can type "or" with the same keystrokes, and it takes
zero setup work and zero memorization (you may forget which keystroke
you set up for ∨, but I doubt you'll forget how to spell "or", even if
you think it means gold/yellow). Where's the benefit? I'm seriously
not seeing it.

ChrisA



More information about the Python-list mailing list