Possibly better loop construct, also labels+goto important and on the fly compiler idea.

[rurpy at yahoo.com]

On 10/28/2013 12:51 AM, rusi wrote:
> > On Monday, October 28, 2013 11:26:21 AM UTC+5:30, rusi wrote:
>> >> On Monday, October 28, 2013 11:10:21 AM UTC+5:30, ru... at yahoo.com
>> >> wrote:
>>> >>> I updated the page, hopefully it's an improvement?
>> >> 
>> >> Otherwise ok I think
> > 
> > Just looked at the general netiquette link -- its long and not much
> > use for a technical oriented forum.

I agree.  Wikipedia is convenient but almost never suitable 
as a learning resource.  I'll see if I can find a friendlier
general netiquette link.  Recommendations welcome.

> > Some items missed (irrespective of GG usage) 1. Good subject line 2.
> > Good code examples http://sscce.org/ 3.
> > http://www.catb.org/esr/faqs/smart-questions.html

I am hesitant to put too many general netiquette rules 
there.  Such rules aren't applicable to only GG users.
The alternate recommendations made to GG users here 
(to use usenet and email) are always made without a 
list of netiquette rules even though the recipients 
are the same people using GG.  Why should GG users be 
told about those rules when they get advice about using
GG but not when they get advice to use email or usenet?

What would be best I think is a separate page with general 
guidelines for posting that any user could be pointed to.

Regarding esr's "smart-questions", although I acknowledge
it has useful advice, I have always found it elitist and 
abrasive.  I wish someone would rewrite it without the 
"we are gods" attitude.

Thanks again for your feedback.