Unicode Objects in Tuples

[Terry Reedy]

On 10/11/2013 9:31 AM, Stephen Tucker wrote:
>
> to be able to by itself. The distinction between the "geekiness" of a
> tuple compared with the "non-geekiness" of a string is, itself, far too
> geeky for my liking. The distinction seems to be an utterly spurious -
> even artificial or arbitrary one to me. (Sorry about the rant.)

There is a better reason for collections using repr for their items, but 
I forget the details.

-- 
Terry Jan Reedy