Languages for different purposes (was Re: New user's initial thoughts / criticisms of Python)
Chris Angelico
rosuav at gmail.com
Mon Nov 11 04:55:28 EST 2013
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 8:28 PM, <wxjmfauth at gmail.com> wrote:
>> * Some languages are just fundamentally bad.
>
> The flexible string representation is a perfect exemple.
Wow. A new low for you, jmf... comparing PEP 393 to Ook?!?
> In fact, with such a mechanism, it is even impossible to write an editor.
And somehow a performance tradeoff makes Python no longer Turing complete.
ChrisA
More information about the Python-list
mailing list