Future standard GUI library

Fábio Santos fabiosantosart at gmail.com
Thu May 23 03:08:12 EDT 2013


It would be way more practical to have an embedded browser. Appjs doesn't
even occupy a port on the client. We could totally benefit from that.
Django applications practically make themselves.
On 23 May 2013 08:02, "Carlos Nepomuceno" <carlosnepomuceno at outlook.com>
wrote:

> You don't! If your app needs local content just use a regular open() (or
> your browser) to read the files and render them as you see fit.
>
> For remote content you just need the 'urllib2' module or something like
> 'requests' module to get the data.
>
> ----------------------------------------
> > Date: Wed, 22 May 2013 19:31:55 -0700
> > Subject: Re: Future standard GUI library
> > From: llanitedave at veawb.coop
> [...]
> >
> > I've been thinking about that myself for some future app ideas. If you
> have a stand-alone app working from your web browser, don't you need an
> embedded web server to utilize the file system? Is a system like Django for
> an app overkill? Or is its embedded development server underkill for a
> single-user browser-based application?
> > --
> > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
> --
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/attachments/20130523/19c79c73/attachment.html>


More information about the Python-list mailing list