Why do Perl programmers make more money than Python programmers

[88888 Dihedral]

Chris Angelico於 2013年5月7日星期二UTC+8下午9時32分55秒寫道：
> On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 11:22 PM, jmfauth <wxjmfauth at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > There are plenty of good reasons to use Python. There are
> 
> > also plenty of good reasons to not use (or now to drop)
> 
> > Python and to realize that if you wish to process text
> 
> > seriously, you are better served by using "corporate
> 
> > products" or tools using Unicode properly.
> 
> 
> 
> There are plenty of good reasons to use Python. One of them is the
> 
> laughs you can get any time jmf posts here. There are also plenty of
> 
> good reasons to drop Python. One of them is because corporate products
> 
> like Microsoft Visual Studio are inherently better specifically
> 
> because they cost you money, and there's no way that something you
> 
> paid nothing for can ever be as good as that. Plus, you get to write
> 
People used MS products  because most bosses did not  want to pay 
the prices of work stations,  the minis, or the main-frames and 
the salaries of the system  administrators  in 199x. 


> code that works on only one platform, and that's really good. Finally,
> 
> moving off Python would mean you don't feel obliged to respond to jmf,
> 
> which will increase your productivity measurably.
> 
> 
> 
> ChrisA

The price issue of a software  package or a platform is not 
the only  way to judge a programming language.