FACTS: WHY THE PYTHON LANGUAGE FAILS.

[Joshua Landau]

On 28 June 2013 20:35, Joel Goldstick <joel.goldstick at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 3:22 PM, Joshua Landau <joshua.landau.ws at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On 28 June 2013 19:52, Wayne Werner <wayne at waynewerner.com> wrote:
>> > On Fri, 28 Jun 2013, 88888 Dihedral wrote:
>> >
>> >> KIND OF BORING TO SHOW HOW THE LISP PROGRAMMING
>> >> WAS ASSIMULATED BY THE PYTHON COMMUNITY.
>> >>
>> >> OF COURSE PYTHON IS A GOOD LANGUAGE FOR DEVELOPING
>> >> ARTIFICIAL INTELEGENT ROBOT PROGRAMS NOT SO BRAIN DAMAGES,
>> >> OR SO SLAVERY AS C/C++ OR ASEMBLY PARTS.
>> >
>> >
>> > Best. Post. EVER.
>>
>> Dihedral is the one spammer to this list who I appreciate -- he comes
>> up with spookily accurate gems one day and then hilarious nonsense the
>> next. One could with all the spammers were bots - they seem to post
>> less too.
>>
>> Alas, Dihedral is in a class of his own.
>> --
>> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-list
>
>
> I was under the impression that Dihedral is a bot, not a person.  Amusing,
> none the less

Well, yes; I wrote my post knowing that. I was saying with "One could
wi[s]h all the spammers were bots - they seem to post less too" that I
would rather that other spammers on this list were more like Dihedral
-- bots :P. We'd have fewer, much more enlightening posts from them
that-a way.