[Python-Dev] New FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT buildbot
Carlos Nepomuceno
carlosnepomuceno at outlook.com
Mon Jun 3 10:49:12 EDT 2013
________________________________
> Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2013 13:43:24 -0700
> Subject: Re: [Python-Dev] New FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT buildbot
> From: drsalists at gmail.com
> To: carlosnepomuceno at outlook.com
> CC: python-dev at python.org
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Carlos Nepomuceno
> <carlosnepomuceno at outlook.com<mailto:carlosnepomuceno at outlook.com>>
> wrote:
> ----------------------------------------
> > Date: Sun, 2 Jun 2013 15:12:43 +1000
> > From: koobs.freebsd at gmail.com<mailto:koobs.freebsd at gmail.com>
> > To: python-dev at python.org<mailto:python-dev at python.org>
> > Subject: [Python-Dev] New FreeBSD 10.0-CURRENT buildbot
> [...]
> > koobs-freebsd10-amd64 (clang is default here)
>
>
> Does CPython code compiled with clang runs faster than gcc?
>
> Why did you chose clang? Any benchmarks? Any benefits?
>
> Clang is sometimes favored over gcc for its non-GPL license; I believe
> the FreeBSD project sees this as an important issue.
>
> In general, the more C compilers a piece of C code compiles on, the
> fewer bugs are left in it, because different C compilers tend to catch
> different problems - even with cranked up warnings.
>
I've been to a Clang presentation and one of the important features they've shown were the improved error messages.
But I didn't try it yet.
More information about the Python-list
mailing list