Bools and explicitness [was Re: PyWart: The problem with "print"]

[Chris Angelico]

On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 1:44 AM, Rick Johnson
<rantingrickjohnson at gmail.com> wrote:
> But we are really ignoring the elephant in the room. Implict
> conversion to Boolean is just a drop in the bucket compared
> to the constant "shell game" we are subjected to when
> reading source code. We so naively believe that a symbol
> named "lst" is a list object or a symbol "age" is a integer,
> when we could be totally wrong! This is the source of many
> subtle bugs!!!

You know, if you want a language with strict type declarations and
extreme run-time efficiency, there are some around. I think one of
them might even be used to make the most popular Python. Give it a
try, you might like it! There's NO WAY that you could accidentally
pass a list to a function that's expecting a float, NO WAY to
unexpectedly call a method on the wrong type of object. It would suit
you perfectly!

ChrisA