PEPs should be included with the documentation download

[Ben Finney]

Ned Deily <nad at acm.org> writes:

> In article <7wvc2xkjvz.fsf at benfinney.id.au>,
>  Ben Finney <ben+python at benfinney.id.au> wrote:
> > Chris Angelico <rosuav at gmail.com> writes:
> > > Hence the question: How many people actually do use the downloaded
> > > docs? Maybe it'd turn out to be quite high, but it's not an
> > > unreasonable question.
> > 
> > I think it's an unreasonable question [in this context].

> In any case if you want to see this happen, someone needs to open an 
> issue and make a case for it on the Python bug tracker.

Neither Chris nor I are proposing to have PEPs in the installed
documentation :-) You might want to respond directly to the original
post with that suggestion.

-- 
 \     “Men never do evil so completely and cheerfully as when they do |
  `\        it from religious conviction.” —Blaise Pascal (1623–1662), |
_o__)                                                   Pensées, #894. |
Ben Finney