On Friday, April 26, 2013 12:05:32 AM UTC+8, Eternaltheft wrote: > Haha i'm confused? im guessing you mean the triangular table i said i posted before? its this one > > > > 1 2 3 4 5 > > 3 4 5 6 > > 5 6 7 > > 7 8 > > 9 > > > > this was the table in my original post omg im an idiot, i didn't mention that the original table is the triangular table..