[TYPES] The type/object distinction and possible synthesis of OOP and imperative programming languages

[88888 Dihedral]

Uday S Reddy於 2013年4月17日星期三UTC+8下午5時10分58秒寫道：
> Mark Janssen writes:
> 
> 
> 
> > > Having said that, theorists do want to unify concepts wherever possible
> 
> > > and wherever they make sense.  Imperative programming types, which I
> 
> > > will call "storage types", are semantically the same as classes.
> 
> > 
The imperative part is supported in Python by tuples only.
The name binding assignment of an object is perative in Python.

Anyway it is not so difficult to mimic the behaviors
and to gain  the benefits of imperative languages  
 at least in the c-python implementation by those
who can play with the Python language in programming.